- Type
- Cloud computing category
- Core offering
- GPU-as-a-Service (GPUaaS) for AI training and inference
- Key providers
- CoreWeave, Nebius, Lambda, Crusoe, Groq, Nscale, Vultr
- Market size
- Over US$25 billion in 2025 (Synergy Research)
- Emerged
- 2023–2024, during the global GPU shortage
- Related
- GPU cluster, AI data centres, sovereign AI
- Type
- Cloud computing category
- Core offering
- GPU-as-a-Service (GPUaaS) for AI training and inference
- Key providers
- CoreWeave, Nebius, Lambda, Crusoe, Groq, Nscale, Vultr
- Market size
- Over US$25 billion in 2025 (Synergy Research)
- Emerged
- 2023–2024, during the global GPU shortage
- Related
- GPU cluster, AI data centres, sovereign AI
History
The term gained usage in 2023 and 2024, when demand for NVIDIA GPUs for large language model training far outstripped the capacity that Amazon, Microsoft and Google could supply, and long waiting lists pushed buyers toward specialists. CoreWeave, which began as a cryptocurrency mining operator, converted its data centres to AI compute and listed on Nasdaq in March 2025; Nebius, Lambda, Crusoe and Nscale expanded rapidly alongside it.[2]
Synergy Research Group recorded neocloud revenues of roughly US$9 billion in the fourth quarter of 2025 — up 223% year over year — and more than US$25 billion for the full year, forecasting the segment would approach US$400 billion by 2031 on a sustained 58% compound annual growth rate.[1] ABI Research separately estimated GPUaaS revenue from neoclouds at US$42 billion in 2025, rising above US$250 billion by 2030.[2]
Technology and Business Model
Neoclouds differ from hyperscalers in three practical ways. First, they operate dense GPU clusters — racks of accelerators interconnected with high-bandwidth fabrics such as InfiniBand or RoCE and usually liquid-cooled — rather than general-purpose server fleets. Second, they offer elastic AI capacity through on-demand instances, reserved commitments and managed Kubernetes or Slurm schedulers tuned for distributed training. Third, their economics rest on long-term capacity contracts and heavy capital expenditure: CoreWeave reported second-quarter 2026 revenue of US$2.575 billion, up 112% year over year, with a backlog of roughly US$104 billion and full-year capital expenditure guidance of US$35–39 billion.[3] Crusoe reported 4.9 gigawatts of contracted AI infrastructure across five United States campuses in June 2026, with a pipeline above 40 GW.[4]
Published pricing is typically lower than list prices for equivalent hyperscaler instances; Lambda, for example, publishes on-demand rates for single GPUs and clusters directly rather than through sales-quoted enterprise agreements.[5] The trade-offs are concentration risk — most neoclouds depend on a single chip supplier, NVIDIA, and on a handful of very large customers — and geographic footprint, since the majority of capacity sits in North America and Europe.[2] Groq illustrates the category's volatility: after licensing its inference technology to NVIDIA in December 2025, the company refocused as an inference neocloud and raised US$350 million in August 2026.[6]
Applications
Neocloud capacity is used for pre-training and fine-tuning foundation models, batch inference for AI products, and high-performance computing workloads such as drug discovery and climate modelling. Enterprises also use it as burst capacity alongside their primary cloud, and AI laboratories rent superclusters for single large training runs without owning a data centre.
>See Also
🇲🇾 Malaysia's rapid data-centre build-out in Johor, Kuala Lumpur and Penang positions the country inside the same supply chain that neoclouds depend on, but almost all neocloud capacity is currently contracted in the United States and Europe.[2] Malaysian AI teams therefore typically reach these providers through token-priced inference APIs rather than by renting whole clusters, which suits small development teams that need frontier models without committing to hardware.
For the public sector and regulated industries, the neocloud model intersects with Malaysia's sovereign compute agenda: the National AI Office (NAIO) and the National AI Compute Exchange frame domestic, controllable compute as strategic infrastructure, while local offerings such as YTL AI Cloud provide an in-country alternative for workloads that must remain under Malaysian jurisdiction. Under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010, organisations sending personal data offshore must still satisfy the Act's protection principles, which makes a provider's data-residency commitment a practical procurement requirement rather than a technical nicety. MDEC's Malaysia Digital framework continues to attract hyperscale and colocation investment, and Malaysian systems integrators increasingly resell GPU capacity as a managed service for local banks, manufacturers and universities.
References
- ↑Synergy Research Group. (2026). Neocloud Market Forecast to Approach $400B by 2031, Driven by Surging AI Infrastructure Demand. https://www.srgresearch.com/articles/neocloud-market-forecast-to-approach-400b-by-2031-driven-by-surging-ai-infrastructure-demand
- ↑ABI Research. Profiling Seven Leading Neocloud Companies. https://www.abiresearch.com/blog/leading-neocloud-companies
- ↑CoreWeave. (2026). CoreWeave Reports Strong Second Quarter 2026 Results. https://investors.coreweave.com/news/news-details/2026/CoreWeave-Reports-Strong-Second-Quarter-2026-Results/default.aspx
- ↑Crusoe. (2026). Contracted AI Infrastructure Capacity Approaches 5 Gigawatts. https://www.crusoe.ai/resources/newsroom/crusoes-contracted-ai-infrastructure-capacity-approaches-5-gigawatts-across-data-centers-and-cloud
- ↑Lambda. Pricing. https://lambda.ai/pricing
- ↑TechCrunch. (2026). Groq raises $350M to fuel its pivot from AI chips to neocloud. https://techcrunch.com/2026/08/17/groq-raises-350m-to-fuel-its-pivot-from-ai-chips-to-neocloud/